Over 30 years in the making! The only such resource available today!!

Now only $495!

  • Motor Carrier Contracts Annotated, Second Edition is a contract form book with four complete contract templates designed for easy use by shippers and their attorneys.
  • The four contract templates include optional provisions with comments and instructions on how to use allowing the user to tailor the contracts for individual clients or situations.


Why spend valuable time and money to “reinvent the wheel”?


Overview of Motor Carrier Contracting:


Prior to 1980, virtually all transportation provided by motor carriers moved according to the terms and conditions of the Uniform Bill of Lading as contained in the National Motor Freight Classification. This is why the Bill of Lading was often referred to as the “contract for carriage.”

Transportation, Logistics and the Law

Buy now at $495
Click here to order Motor Carrier Contracts
After 1980, shippers and carriers began to negotiate individual contracts. The primary motivation for shippers to negotiate individual contracts is to avoid the “unintended consequences” and tariff “surprises and traps” which are typically found in a carrier’s private tariffs, terms and conditions, service guide, etc. These could relate to limits of liability for loss and damage, accessorial charges, or other “special charges”, late payment penalties, and other items which a shipper would not knowingly agree to prior to doing business with a carrier.

The drafting philosophy of the Contract template is to be “shipper friendly” in that its terms are generally more favorable to a shipper than those that would be found in a carrier’s own tariffs or terms and conditions. However, at the same time it is drawn so as to not be so onerous for a carrier that a carrier would automatically reject it.

The 2011 edition of Motor Carrier Contracts Annotated had two contract templates --- one titled “Contract for Transportation by Motor Carrier” and one titled “Contract for Brokerage of Motor Carrier Transportation”.

The Second Edition of Motor Carrier Contracts Annotated has thoroughly revised and updated the provisions of those two prior contract templates to reflect changes in the law and industry practices occurring since 2011.

NEW! Shipper-Provider Contract Template.

The 2011 edition of Motor Carrier Contracts Annotated contained just two contract templates. One was for a shipper to use with a motor carrier and one was for a shipper to use with a broker arranging for motor carrier transportation. There were just two templates because, generally speaking, that was how contracting was done at that point in time.

That all changed with the passing of the 2012 Highway Bill (Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act or MAP-21) and an unanticipated consequence of its provisions.

As MAP-21 went into effect and the industry became aware of it, large, national transportation providers would add language into the shipper-carrier contract saying, “We reserve the right to use our brokerage authority for the shipments tendered to us pursuant to this contract.” While this would satisfy the legal obligation of the providers, simply adding this language to a shipper-carrier contract does not adequately address the many issues relating to using as a broker.

This all gave rise to a need for another contract template which would provide for one shipper to contract with one corporate entity who held licenses both as a motor carrier and as a broker. In Motor Carrier Contacts Annotated, Second Edition it is called a Shipper-Provider Contract Template.

NEW! Shipper-Provider Contract Including Intermodal Template.

When an intermodal service is offered by a regulated motor carrier, it can do so by issuing a through bill of lading from origin to destination. When this is done by regulated motor carriers, it is often referred to as “substituted service”.

In 1977 the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) used the authority granted to it by Congress to exempt intermodal services. This gave rise to a new type of provider known as Intermodal Marketing Companies or IMCs. However, it is important to note that companies that customers think of as being a motor carrier or truck broker will also offer these exempt or unregulated services without using their motor carrier or truck broker license to do so.

The template titled “Shipper-Provider Contract Including Intermodal for Transportation by Motor Carrier AND Brokerage of Motor Carrier Transportation” is drafted to cover these service variations.

"Just one of the reasons you need to have a contract"
Without a well drafted motor carrier contract in place with the companies used by you, your subsidiaries and affiliates, you are likely not compliant under GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley). Companies are required to reflect contingent liabilities on their balance sheets. However, if your organization uses trucking companies without a contract in place, your company faces substantial contingent liabilities for late payment penalties which most companies are unaware of and thus don't report them.

The late payment trap... and how it can be avoided

Most medium and large size trucking companies quote their rates in terms of a discount off of their standard rates. In today’s market, these discount ranges are typically in the range of 60%, 80%, or even higher.

When there is no individually negotiated contract between the trucking company and its customer, the transactions are governed by the carrier's standard trading conditions and tariffs. These tariffs typically provide that when a payment is “late”, that is, not received by the trucking company within 30 days, there is a late payment penalty imposed of the loss of discount.

For example, if a company had an 80% discount with its carriers, had an annual freight spend of $1,000,000 and paid all of its invoices 31 days or more after receipt, it would have a contingent liability of $4,000,000! This liability can be imposed whenever the carrier chooses to impose it. For instance, if your company were to take its business to another carrier or if the trucking company went into bankruptcy.

With a properly drafted individually negotiated contract in place between your company and the trucking company, such late payment penalties can easily be negotiated away and replaced with commercially reasonable service charges.

Click here to view or download the Table of Contents


What do you receive?


  • • 80+ pages of contract clauses and commentary furnished in an electronic format.
  • • Purchasers of the text will be entitled to a complimentary 30 minute consultation with the Author.

Here is what Mike Regan , President of TranzAct Technologies, Inc., Logistics Management magazine featured blogger, and industry leader had to say about the first edition of Motor Carrier Contracts Annotated in this 2:00 Minute Warning - Click Here.

About the Author:


Brent Wm. Primus, J.D., represented the shipper in the pivotal case of The Bankruptcy Estate of United Shipping Company, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc., 34 F.3d, 1383 (8th Cir. 1994). This decision of the former Interstate Commerce Commission set the stage for modern motor carrier contracting in a deregulated environment. Since that time Brent has worked extensively with shippers to develop and negotiate their contracts with various categories of transportation service providers.

About the Editor:


Laurel E. Learmonth, J.D., is a shareholder in Primus Law Office, P.A. and a Senior Editor for transportlawtexts, inc. Laurel has represented both corporate and individual clients in a variety of business transactions and litigation matters in both state and federal court. This includes transportation matters such as pursuing and defending cargo claims and collecting or defending disputed freight charges.